Thomas Zander [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-07-30 📝 Original message:On Thursday 30. July 2015 ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-07-30
📝 Original message:On Thursday 30. July 2015 16.25.02 Pieter Wuille via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> here is a proposal for long-term scalability I've been working on:
> https://gist.github.com/sipa/c65665fc360ca7a176a6
>
> Some things are not included yet, such as a testnet whose size runs ahead
> of the main chain, and the inclusion of Gavin's more accurate sigop
> checking after the hard fork.
>
> Comments?
Maybe this part could use a bit more rationale, it looks like its a sudden and
unexplained.
> No hard forking change that relaxes the block size limit can be guaranteed
> to provide enough space for every possible demand - or even any particular
> demand - unless strong centralization of the mining ecosystem is expected.
--
Thomas Zander
📝 Original message:On Thursday 30. July 2015 16.25.02 Pieter Wuille via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> here is a proposal for long-term scalability I've been working on:
> https://gist.github.com/sipa/c65665fc360ca7a176a6
>
> Some things are not included yet, such as a testnet whose size runs ahead
> of the main chain, and the inclusion of Gavin's more accurate sigop
> checking after the hard fork.
>
> Comments?
Maybe this part could use a bit more rationale, it looks like its a sudden and
unexplained.
> No hard forking change that relaxes the block size limit can be guaranteed
> to provide enough space for every possible demand - or even any particular
> demand - unless strong centralization of the mining ecosystem is expected.
--
Thomas Zander