Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: š Original date posted:2016-09-09 š Original message:On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at ...
š
Original date posted:2016-09-09
š Original message:On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 01:48:40AM +0000, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 12:58 AM, Peter Todd <pete at petertodd.org> wrote:
> > Good to do this sooner rather than later, as alert propagation on the P2P
> > network is going to continue to get less reliable as nodes upgrade to software
>
> Yes, this was one of my motivations for doing this soon.
>
> It would only require about 2 LOC to have Bitcoin Core vomit out a
> blob containing the final alert to any old protocol version peers that
> connect. I don't know how other people would feel about that, but I
> wouldn't mind implementing it, and it would greatly improve the
> likelihood that they continue to to get once propagation of it is
> gone. This could be left in the codebase for a couple years or until
> other changes made those old versions p2p incompatible for other
> reasons.
I think that's a good idea, and it's a simple way to document that final alert
as well.
--
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160910/3071c2e5/attachment.sig>
š Original message:On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 01:48:40AM +0000, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 12:58 AM, Peter Todd <pete at petertodd.org> wrote:
> > Good to do this sooner rather than later, as alert propagation on the P2P
> > network is going to continue to get less reliable as nodes upgrade to software
>
> Yes, this was one of my motivations for doing this soon.
>
> It would only require about 2 LOC to have Bitcoin Core vomit out a
> blob containing the final alert to any old protocol version peers that
> connect. I don't know how other people would feel about that, but I
> wouldn't mind implementing it, and it would greatly improve the
> likelihood that they continue to to get once propagation of it is
> gone. This could be left in the codebase for a couple years or until
> other changes made those old versions p2p incompatible for other
> reasons.
I think that's a good idea, and it's a simple way to document that final alert
as well.
--
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160910/3071c2e5/attachment.sig>