Jim Posen [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2018-05-23 📝 Original message: Only place I see the ...

📅 Original date posted:2018-05-23
📝 Original message:
Only place I see the onion peeling discussed is here:
https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lightning-rfc/issues/182.

On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 3:50 PM, ZmnSCPxj via Lightning-dev <
lightning-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> Good morning Corne,
>
> I think onion unpeeling never made it into the BOLT spec precisely due to
> the problems with it. I think the unpeeling in question is essentially a
> hop node (rather than the ultimate payer/source) unpeeling the onion in
> order to find out who was being slow. Perhaps the discussion regarding it
> is archived elsewhere; I do not know myself.
>
> Regards,
> ZmnSCPxj
>
> ​Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.​
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>
> On May 22, 2018 11:47 PM, Corné Plooy via Lightning-dev <
> lightning-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> > > You missed the vital detail: that you must prove channel closure if you
> > >
> > > can't unpeel the onion further. That will hit an unresponsive party
> > >
> > > with a penalty.[1]
> >
> > Is this specified in a BOLT somewhere? I tried to find it several times,
> >
> > without success.
> >
> > CJP
> >
> > Lightning-dev mailing list
> >
> > Lightning-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> >
> > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lightning-dev mailing list
> Lightning-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20180523/698b6d09/attachment.html>;