C_JackSparo on Nostr: The sad thing about war is that only one side has to want it, for both sides to be ...
The sad thing about war is that only one side has to want it, for both sides to be forced to have it.
While this seems like anargument for American isolationists. It's actually an argument in favor of foreign wars.
For example countries such as China & Russia have made their intentions clear about who they want to be the world power. While countries like Iran and some others have made their ideologies against western living clear. The problem is that all roads lead to a single outcome. War.
There's no escaping it, when one wants it…
Knowing the inevitable one tries to find a method of war with the least amount of casualties. However more important than overall casualties is the casualties on your side. It may seem an immoral suggestion, however under further investigation the raw truth of this reality emerges.
This being the case, the best place for a war you must have is usually on foreign soil.
While this seems like anargument for American isolationists. It's actually an argument in favor of foreign wars.
For example countries such as China & Russia have made their intentions clear about who they want to be the world power. While countries like Iran and some others have made their ideologies against western living clear. The problem is that all roads lead to a single outcome. War.
There's no escaping it, when one wants it…
Knowing the inevitable one tries to find a method of war with the least amount of casualties. However more important than overall casualties is the casualties on your side. It may seem an immoral suggestion, however under further investigation the raw truth of this reality emerges.
This being the case, the best place for a war you must have is usually on foreign soil.