Phil Sturgeon on Nostr: nprofile1q…d5v05 articles about studies are definitively reductionist otherwise ...
nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqtglml5d4d9temsxzjl7jcefac4azlc7elm5v34rx3ferza66dnls8d5v05 (nprofile…5v05) articles about studies are definitively reductionist otherwise they’d be reposting the study.
In the U.K. we need to increase woodland cover by 3% (I work on this) and solar panels by 0.2% so we aren’t picking one or the other here.
Thankfully it’s not about constant shade because the sun “moves” meaning a variety of shade tolerances are supported beneath the panels.
In the U.K. we need to increase woodland cover by 3% (I work on this) and solar panels by 0.2% so we aren’t picking one or the other here.
Thankfully it’s not about constant shade because the sun “moves” meaning a variety of shade tolerances are supported beneath the panels.