Mark Kraft on Nostr: Absolutely. Bluesky is ABSOLUTELY vulnerable right now. Bluesky needs, as I said, ...
Absolutely.
Bluesky is ABSOLUTELY vulnerable right now.
Bluesky needs, as I said, systems created to STAY ETHICAL.
And, as you said, the risk here OBVIOUSLY has nothing to do with their VC backing.
Ergo, by your logic, THEY should adopt standards like Mastodon's founder just accepted, to STAY ETHICAL, adopted by those MOST LIKELY to do harm.
Why put the burden on #mastodon's users to pay for a kludge to try to keep #bluesky's VC backers ethical, without so much as a promise they'll do so?
Bluesky is ABSOLUTELY vulnerable right now.
Bluesky needs, as I said, systems created to STAY ETHICAL.
And, as you said, the risk here OBVIOUSLY has nothing to do with their VC backing.
Ergo, by your logic, THEY should adopt standards like Mastodon's founder just accepted, to STAY ETHICAL, adopted by those MOST LIKELY to do harm.
Why put the burden on #mastodon's users to pay for a kludge to try to keep #bluesky's VC backers ethical, without so much as a promise they'll do so?