bitbuybyte on Nostr: Interviewee starts with how the event has been memory holed in a conspiratorial way. ...
Interviewee starts with how the event has been memory holed in a conspiratorial way.
From my opinions it makes more sense that it was memory holed because MSM/Google has never liked Trump, and the fact that someone nearly killed him is a boon to his campaign.
I think it is intriguing that the Bush 911 and Trump bullet photo were taken by the same photographer.
Shoe tangent, interesting (because I have noticed it myself from a psychological standpoint from other casualty events), but not sure how it ties into conclusive conspiracy.
Stopped taken notes at this point because he just makes so many points that I find a logical non-conspiratorial explanation for or am not compelled enough at this point to try to verify his point of view one way or the other.
All in all, I feel like I sort of got lost in the episode and he was jumping all over the place from different conspiracies to different conspiracies. BTW, I probably agree with him on many things that were false flags, JFK and Pearl Harbor at a minimum. The onus should be on him to lay his base case up front, and tie it in with facts throughout the interview to support this. Basic writing/narration. This never happened and could have been the fault of the podcast host.
All that said, I’m still not sold and honestly not even sure what he was arguing besides that just about everything is a grand conspiracy.
Show me the incentives and I will show you the outcome. That is my base case for life and what I look for when there is ‘conspiracy.’ He did not do this. I see incentives for the Iraq war with 911 and incentives for Israel/Gaza war with October 7th. Whether these events were orchestrated or occurred due to incompetence is up for discussion.
From my opinions it makes more sense that it was memory holed because MSM/Google has never liked Trump, and the fact that someone nearly killed him is a boon to his campaign.
I think it is intriguing that the Bush 911 and Trump bullet photo were taken by the same photographer.
Shoe tangent, interesting (because I have noticed it myself from a psychological standpoint from other casualty events), but not sure how it ties into conclusive conspiracy.
Stopped taken notes at this point because he just makes so many points that I find a logical non-conspiratorial explanation for or am not compelled enough at this point to try to verify his point of view one way or the other.
All in all, I feel like I sort of got lost in the episode and he was jumping all over the place from different conspiracies to different conspiracies. BTW, I probably agree with him on many things that were false flags, JFK and Pearl Harbor at a minimum. The onus should be on him to lay his base case up front, and tie it in with facts throughout the interview to support this. Basic writing/narration. This never happened and could have been the fault of the podcast host.
All that said, I’m still not sold and honestly not even sure what he was arguing besides that just about everything is a grand conspiracy.
Show me the incentives and I will show you the outcome. That is my base case for life and what I look for when there is ‘conspiracy.’ He did not do this. I see incentives for the Iraq war with 911 and incentives for Israel/Gaza war with October 7th. Whether these events were orchestrated or occurred due to incompetence is up for discussion.