mikedilger on Nostr: I don't think you are entirely wrong. But where I think you are wrong, I highly doubt ...
I don't think you are entirely wrong. But where I think you are wrong, I highly doubt you would change you rmind via debate. So I see it as pointless.
Let's just say that I believe race is so fuzzy of a property that is is a poor way to pre-judge someone. Individual variability is high, and therefore any pre-judgement based on race is a poor way to summarily evaluate people. I actually think pre-judgement based on race and sex and everything else is fine and normal and useful when you have nothing else to go on. But it's not effective enough to close your mind about a person because individual variability is so significant.
I may be wrong but I'm not easily swayed. And you can have a different view. And we can both keep using nostr.
Let's just say that I believe race is so fuzzy of a property that is is a poor way to pre-judge someone. Individual variability is high, and therefore any pre-judgement based on race is a poor way to summarily evaluate people. I actually think pre-judgement based on race and sex and everything else is fine and normal and useful when you have nothing else to go on. But it's not effective enough to close your mind about a person because individual variability is so significant.
I may be wrong but I'm not easily swayed. And you can have a different view. And we can both keep using nostr.