TheGuySwann on Nostr: Way too much to answer in one tweet, but a good place to start to realize the ...
Way too much to answer in one tweet, but a good place to start to realize the unreliability of what "political science" produces is to read about "climate gate" to see where the 1940s warming period & subsequent cooling went & why it doesn't show up in these data sets anymore. Then I would also suggest reading "Unsettled" by Steve Koonin who was as deep down the climate crisis rabbit hole you could get and wanted to stress test the data and conclusions as a matter for building an undeniable argument... only to come away realizing how little of the narrative holds any water at all.
He has a very reasoned and pragmatic approach & isn't at all a "right wing conspiracy theorist." And I'll just add to cap it off: the idea that the planet is getting warmer (regardless of how much the models often presented make it look exaggerated) does not at all equate to "crisis" without multiple, rather enormous, logical leaps to follow.
Published at
2023-03-15 17:27:00Event JSON
{
"id": "8385b03355d67cf59c6bae7660f8d76e8093bbf14340203a0ee4569946daaaaa",
"pubkey": "b9e76546ba06456ed301d9e52bc49fa48e70a6bf2282be7a1ae72947612023dc",
"created_at": 1678901220,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"9a0fa7f70b85d9ed883e90e19ebbbdbd2e06ab8780c5eef9d969d370ce8940be",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"a1b0a07b120ab08ffbee385994cd3c31c7100e25720bac9efcc144e5a13785cc",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"d5415a313d38461ff93a8c170f941b2cd4a66a5cfdbb093406960f6cb317849f"
],
[
"p",
"b9e76546ba06456ed301d9e52bc49fa48e70a6bf2282be7a1ae72947612023dc"
],
[
"p",
"782181faf8c22e18eb10704aad0e75095e46c5fe66925b2a4f696d24f3ed52c2"
]
],
"content": "Way too much to answer in one tweet, but a good place to start to realize the unreliability of what \"political science\" produces is to read about \"climate gate\" to see where the 1940s warming period \u0026 subsequent cooling went \u0026 why it doesn't show up in these data sets anymore. Then I would also suggest reading \"Unsettled\" by Steve Koonin who was as deep down the climate crisis rabbit hole you could get and wanted to stress test the data and conclusions as a matter for building an undeniable argument... only to come away realizing how little of the narrative holds any water at all.\n\nHe has a very reasoned and pragmatic approach \u0026 isn't at all a \"right wing conspiracy theorist.\" And I'll just add to cap it off: the idea that the planet is getting warmer (regardless of how much the models often presented make it look exaggerated) does not at all equate to \"crisis\" without multiple, rather enormous, logical leaps to follow.",
"sig": "e0d71d05b3b4f94623d3b6381d8ea494ed20fbd913bb213ee440c27be4fb31796bc6e134e07ed08d6e6333985b939e60dae95de26862a3a2114d29212f84e424"
}
