Event JSON
{
"id": "8f516ea2bab34fda872eb1bfaed9a4786e44490a778b55cb7cd11044114634f6",
"pubkey": "9eefd04d32ab5da8de12d7b83201578ea095a676acf3a692ec1b0b202ae4e16f",
"created_at": 1694698497,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"e4932863e9ccc69b9f84726de7b43e168afabfc3be40d6c8e3dacd56c015c4bf",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"b3d0c2f035a0c1cb2990cd30e30284ec65e4d1bbe5ac9589ee9749bae609e796",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"17675eb3ffb7277ac7fb5b406bb01834f6a37aafa5fb75523e4687eb769e4f8a",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://mastodon.social/users/design_law/statuses/111063760764476366",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1ujfjsclfenrfh8uywfk70dp7z690407rheqddj8rmtx4dsq4cjlsjmaw8v Well, sometimes, these Schedule A plaintiffs argue they have to keep the exact marks/patents secret so as not to tip off nefarious \"foreign counterfeiters,\" who they allege are tracking U.S. PACER dockets. But here, we know the plaintiff's name, product, and patent numbers. So I have no idea what the alleged justification for keeping any copyright or trademark registrations secret might be.",
"sig": "b862f8676b69c56354dc9e21875d677a41425fbe41cb35c03f32531e3bd1adc1cae4e8e5a3bfc1fb24d2455315d327e3131035552596a887b38fc243198c22e4"
}