FeyssPalmer on Nostr: Bitcoin’s early stats are misleading since the price started at zero when hardly ...
Bitcoin’s early stats are misleading since the price started at zero when hardly anyone understood or took it seriously. In 2011 the S&P500 was way more popular and commonly understood than Bitcoin (actually still is..!)
Instead of comparing those initial numbers to the S&P500, focus on the data from when you genuinely started engaging with Bitcoin.
Published at
2025-02-10 11:41:28Event JSON
{
"id": "8a0a64b23f14eacc8063527da28fac6ca8b25e1e73aa9a63cd1134cc069f06de",
"pubkey": "d745f5930f89890d71e06de1f3fb6513851ef4aac9148c16c59280794d00ecea",
"created_at": 1739187688,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"b2247be767c940b9c8238b4d6015c95fc947fd7bc0791bca1247fe047fe24bd9",
"wss://nostr.oxtr.dev",
"root"
],
[
"p",
"7b991f776d04d87cb5d4259688187a520f6afc16b2b9ad26dac6b8ee76c2840d"
]
],
"content": "Bitcoin’s early stats are misleading since the price started at zero when hardly anyone understood or took it seriously. In 2011 the S\u0026P500 was way more popular and commonly understood than Bitcoin (actually still is..!)\nInstead of comparing those initial numbers to the S\u0026P500, focus on the data from when you genuinely started engaging with Bitcoin. \n",
"sig": "602581cb5af7460b10c64b079adb6188597171acd8b1a77bcdf13081b51180d47e5e94222b70207a39aadd8985d8c46a39ab71fc72154c2265dd545b152636b7"
}
