bostonwine on Nostr: They 100% would not have It’s a perfect example of the counter-argument to “I ...
They 100% would not have
It’s a perfect example of the counter-argument to “I have nothing to hide, so I don’t need privacy”. We all will eventually. Regimes change.
People are so quick to jump on the partisan bandwagon, to “support the current thing”, because it’s much easier to default to the viewpoint held by the rest of your tribe, than it is to think critically about a nuanced, difficult, or emotionally charged topic.
Supporting the right to protest means both the Canadian truckers *and* BLM.
Supporting the right to bodily autonomy means both vaccine choice *and* abortion access.
Party is easier to choose than principles. In the example above, the party is exposing people to an important principle.
Hopefully, for some, it will stick...
It’s a perfect example of the counter-argument to “I have nothing to hide, so I don’t need privacy”. We all will eventually. Regimes change.
People are so quick to jump on the partisan bandwagon, to “support the current thing”, because it’s much easier to default to the viewpoint held by the rest of your tribe, than it is to think critically about a nuanced, difficult, or emotionally charged topic.
Supporting the right to protest means both the Canadian truckers *and* BLM.
Supporting the right to bodily autonomy means both vaccine choice *and* abortion access.
Party is easier to choose than principles. In the example above, the party is exposing people to an important principle.
Hopefully, for some, it will stick...