jqw22 on Nostr: https://m.primal.net/JmrX.png I stumbled across Nostr 9 months ago and would describe ...
I stumbled across Nostr 9 months ago and would describe myself as interested user. It has been facinating to listen to the original protocol & app builders and Nostr advocates and the experience has encouraged me, together with other reasons, to engage in social media for the first time and for this I acknowledge a debt to developers and entrepreneurs who have made this possible.
However, one aspect of the conversations I've followed has always struck a disonant chord, and it's the phrase 'we are winning'. Winning against who? Is this a zero sum game? And aside from the male orientation of the term, will the idea of winning as a motivating force carry any meaning in the long term, where deeper sources of energy will need to be found. Sources which include a feminine aspect.
I can accept the phrase as a motivating rallying cry in the first stage of attempting to build a new protocol, but now that has been achieved should 'surviving' be the next focus and is it possible to envisage a future of surviving without winning?
Is it worth remembering that revolutions tend to mimic the very things they overthrew before becoming even worse. So is Nostr about revolution or about building a protocol to survive a hundred years? The later takes a very different road to the former, not seeking glory or fame, not seeking to overthrow, but building from the ground up and slowly making a difference in a way which will allow users will experience something more than simply replicating their experience on other apps.
Stay humble and build slowly.
#note
Published at
2024-08-03 15:47:12Event JSON
{
"id": "88f2caaee3a3209898e22466ef05ae2f0fb6283da1a811294029f4093eb459f1",
"pubkey": "ba4a39eeb087135245e2bc2267da2724a94a07443752b88ba0c3533ddf9b4c6b",
"created_at": 1722700032,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"note"
]
],
"content": "https://m.primal.net/JmrX.png \n\nI stumbled across Nostr 9 months ago and would describe myself as interested user. It has been facinating to listen to the original protocol \u0026 app builders and Nostr advocates and the experience has encouraged me, together with other reasons, to engage in social media for the first time and for this I acknowledge a debt to developers and entrepreneurs who have made this possible.\n\nHowever, one aspect of the conversations I've followed has always struck a disonant chord, and it's the phrase 'we are winning'. Winning against who? Is this a zero sum game? And aside from the male orientation of the term, will the idea of winning as a motivating force carry any meaning in the long term, where deeper sources of energy will need to be found. Sources which include a feminine aspect.\n\nI can accept the phrase as a motivating rallying cry in the first stage of attempting to build a new protocol, but now that has been achieved should 'surviving' be the next focus and is it possible to envisage a future of surviving without winning?\n\nIs it worth remembering that revolutions tend to mimic the very things they overthrew before becoming even worse. So is Nostr about revolution or about building a protocol to survive a hundred years? The later takes a very different road to the former, not seeking glory or fame, not seeking to overthrow, but building from the ground up and slowly making a difference in a way which will allow users will experience something more than simply replicating their experience on other apps.\n\nStay humble and build slowly.\n\n#note",
"sig": "9568146b80f26003d79f954d9c7353eba047cd0b898668640afb4908e2c800a5cf63aa19e570ad2ca3ba96e11b88f157d113882bd7fd6379857c688f58672984"
}
