bitcoinstr on Nostr: Civil court has the standard of guilty by a “preponderance of evidence”. But a ...

Civil court has the standard of guilty by a “preponderance of evidence”. But a criminal conviction is only possible with evidence of “beyond a reasonable doubt”

What I have seen from east coast judges is a blurring of that line requiring higher standards.

You would never see that in Indiana courts. The accused clearly has an advatage in a proper court. But not so much in the Kangaroo courts of New York and D.C.