derd on Nostr: not really, standard open source cryptography doesn't need to be authorized in ...
not really, standard open source cryptography doesn't need to be authorized in France. exotic, proprietary one, like telegram, does. why didn't they license it with the French? because it's likely backdoored.
can we please all go back to shilling actual privacy focused foss code?
Published at
2024-08-27 09:35:12Event JSON
{
"id": "85030220cfd02f08c16b52bf0847e4cab7e57d7f842ecd12e84ff3904c2de098",
"pubkey": "b99b0d7d035f26c4fed341b7ce95f628e5b52b2ac9258ea3ddb16be39b88c329",
"created_at": 1724751312,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"50d94fc2d8580c682b071a542f8b1e31a200b0508bab95a33bef0855df281d63"
],
[
"e",
"0b98d4f236205266bc9442af50ef9db2823b1cd50ebff915efa879c1432e5a51",
"wss://relay.primal.net",
"root"
]
],
"content": "not really, standard open source cryptography doesn't need to be authorized in France. exotic, proprietary one, like telegram, does. why didn't they license it with the French? because it's likely backdoored. \n\ncan we please all go back to shilling actual privacy focused foss code?",
"sig": "17cfe5ababb8aec3f57d4938abe2f27913be616ad0472f4e8905d232c59af514bd37d5725b684c700a75af64441e126cabf5f1461467c7249a4e1f5785ee3f1e"
}
