Jorge Timón [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2017-05-30 📝 Original message:On Wed, May 31, 2017 at ...
📅 Original date posted:2017-05-30
📝 Original message:On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 1:50 AM, James MacWhyte <macwhyte at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> The 1MB classic block size prevents quadratic hashing
>> problems from being any worse than they are today.
>>
>
> Add a transaction-size limit of, say, 10kb and the quadratic hashing problem
> is a non-issue. Donezo.
Why is it https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/validation.cpp#L1661
not enough at this point?
Why the need for a transaction size limit?
📝 Original message:On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 1:50 AM, James MacWhyte <macwhyte at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> The 1MB classic block size prevents quadratic hashing
>> problems from being any worse than they are today.
>>
>
> Add a transaction-size limit of, say, 10kb and the quadratic hashing problem
> is a non-issue. Donezo.
Why is it https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/validation.cpp#L1661
not enough at this point?
Why the need for a transaction size limit?