Luke Dashjr [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2017-05-23 📝 Original message:On Tuesday 23 May 2017 ...
📅 Original date posted:2017-05-23
📝 Original message:On Tuesday 23 May 2017 6:30:01 AM Karl Johan Alm via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Essentially, if we make a potentially very harmful option easy to
> enable for users, we are putting them at risk, so yes, this is about
> protecting users of the base Bitcoin Core implementation.
In this case, NOT enforcing BIP148 puts users at more risk. Since devs are
divided in opinion, we should at the very least have an option to let users
decide one way or the other.
Luke
📝 Original message:On Tuesday 23 May 2017 6:30:01 AM Karl Johan Alm via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Essentially, if we make a potentially very harmful option easy to
> enable for users, we are putting them at risk, so yes, this is about
> protecting users of the base Bitcoin Core implementation.
In this case, NOT enforcing BIP148 puts users at more risk. Since devs are
divided in opinion, we should at the very least have an option to let users
decide one way or the other.
Luke