Caleb James DeLisle [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: đź“… Original date posted:2013-06-27 đź“ť Original message:On 06/27/2013 01:56 PM, ...
đź“… Original date posted:2013-06-27
đź“ť Original message:On 06/27/2013 01:56 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Jim <jim618 at fastmail.co.uk> wrote:
>> Let me know if you think this is a good idea (or not!)
>> and if you have any questions.
>
> Being able to promote a fast SPV desktop wallet would be great!
>
> I went through an cycle of testing on multibit after I saw some
> complaints when it went up on the page before without at lot of
> discussion. There were a number of issues with it at the time, in
> particular the frequent deadlocks— though Mike was saying that those
> should be fixed.
>
> I see some of the the other things that were concerning for me at the
> time are still uncorrected though, e.g. no proxy support (so users
> can't follow our recommended best practices of using it with Tor),
If I were a Bitcoin dev, I would not want to talk about anonymity or
TOR because that's likely to attract people with paranoid dilutions
and they're really terrible users to support :)
Also yay for promoting fast, easy to use clients for casual users!
Thanks,
Caleb
> that it reuses addresses (esp for change), that it doesn't clearly
> distinguish confirmation level. It also make repeated https
> connections to 141.101.113.245? (I'm not seeing the IP in the source,
> and it doesn't have a useful reverse dns entry, so I can't tell what
> its for). Is there any timeframe for changing any of this stuff?
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
>
> Build for Windows Store.
>
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
đź“ť Original message:On 06/27/2013 01:56 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Jim <jim618 at fastmail.co.uk> wrote:
>> Let me know if you think this is a good idea (or not!)
>> and if you have any questions.
>
> Being able to promote a fast SPV desktop wallet would be great!
>
> I went through an cycle of testing on multibit after I saw some
> complaints when it went up on the page before without at lot of
> discussion. There were a number of issues with it at the time, in
> particular the frequent deadlocks— though Mike was saying that those
> should be fixed.
>
> I see some of the the other things that were concerning for me at the
> time are still uncorrected though, e.g. no proxy support (so users
> can't follow our recommended best practices of using it with Tor),
If I were a Bitcoin dev, I would not want to talk about anonymity or
TOR because that's likely to attract people with paranoid dilutions
and they're really terrible users to support :)
Also yay for promoting fast, easy to use clients for casual users!
Thanks,
Caleb
> that it reuses addresses (esp for change), that it doesn't clearly
> distinguish confirmation level. It also make repeated https
> connections to 141.101.113.245? (I'm not seeing the IP in the source,
> and it doesn't have a useful reverse dns entry, so I can't tell what
> its for). Is there any timeframe for changing any of this stuff?
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
>
> Build for Windows Store.
>
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>