Amir Taaki [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: đź“… Original date posted:2012-04-30 đź“ť Original message:Are we looking at the same ...
đź“… Original date posted:2012-04-30
đź“ť Original message:Are we looking at the same list? Because here is the order I added: Bitcoin-Qt, Armory, Electrum and MultiBit. Maybe try CTRL-F5 to force a refresh of your browser.
Also about the descriptions: yeah I know. I think it's better to put this up first and then have everyone submit their own descriptions and screenshots. Otherwise it'll be a nightmare to coordinate until everything is perfect. I did message you on IRC today but maybe you were offline.
I didn't copy paste the Armory description from the website because it really sounds too spammy like a sales pitch. Here I was trying to give an even handed balanced overview of all the clients. For each client I was trying to empaphise a 'theme'. Bitcoin-Qt is stability. Armory is advanced. Electrum is convenient. MultiBit is ease of use.
________________________________
From: Alan Reiner <etotheipi at gmail.com>
To: Amir Taaki <zgenjix at yahoo.com>
Cc: "bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net" <bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 7:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] new bitcoin.org clients page
Hey, looks good! Â I'm glad to see them sorted alphabetically :)
A couple comments: Â I don't think the entries for "wallet security" and "backups" accurately describe Armory. Â Wallet Security should say "Encrypt/Offline" or something to to that effect -- after all, offline wallets are the holy grail feature of the Armory. Â And backups should say something like "One-time Printable" if it fits within the box. Â
Otherwise, I really like the layout and design. Â Although despite the fact I enjoy being first on the list, I think Bitcoin-Qt should still go first. Â It is the "reference" client, and I think it's relevant that it is the "de-facto" client for the majority of users, and the one with the most quality control and stability.
-Alan
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Amir Taaki <zgenjix at yahoo.com> wrote:
Check it :) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.org/pull/34
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Live Security Virtual Conference
>Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
>threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
>will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
>threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
>_______________________________________________
>Bitcoin-development mailing list
>Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
đź“ť Original message:Are we looking at the same list? Because here is the order I added: Bitcoin-Qt, Armory, Electrum and MultiBit. Maybe try CTRL-F5 to force a refresh of your browser.
Also about the descriptions: yeah I know. I think it's better to put this up first and then have everyone submit their own descriptions and screenshots. Otherwise it'll be a nightmare to coordinate until everything is perfect. I did message you on IRC today but maybe you were offline.
I didn't copy paste the Armory description from the website because it really sounds too spammy like a sales pitch. Here I was trying to give an even handed balanced overview of all the clients. For each client I was trying to empaphise a 'theme'. Bitcoin-Qt is stability. Armory is advanced. Electrum is convenient. MultiBit is ease of use.
________________________________
From: Alan Reiner <etotheipi at gmail.com>
To: Amir Taaki <zgenjix at yahoo.com>
Cc: "bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net" <bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 7:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] new bitcoin.org clients page
Hey, looks good! Â I'm glad to see them sorted alphabetically :)
A couple comments: Â I don't think the entries for "wallet security" and "backups" accurately describe Armory. Â Wallet Security should say "Encrypt/Offline" or something to to that effect -- after all, offline wallets are the holy grail feature of the Armory. Â And backups should say something like "One-time Printable" if it fits within the box. Â
Otherwise, I really like the layout and design. Â Although despite the fact I enjoy being first on the list, I think Bitcoin-Qt should still go first. Â It is the "reference" client, and I think it's relevant that it is the "de-facto" client for the majority of users, and the one with the most quality control and stability.
-Alan
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Amir Taaki <zgenjix at yahoo.com> wrote:
Check it :) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.org/pull/34
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Live Security Virtual Conference
>Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
>threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
>will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
>threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
>_______________________________________________
>Bitcoin-development mailing list
>Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>