Wladimir J. van der Laan [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-06-18 📝 Original message:On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-06-18
📝 Original message:On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 06:05:58PM +0200, Mike Hearn wrote:
> Once a draft BIP has been submitted to bitcoin-development for
> consideration, the Bitcoin Core maintainer will deliver a preliminary
> yes/no verdict within three weeks. This verdict may be informed by the
> debate that has taken part in the previous three weeks. If more time is
> required, the maintainer is required to request an extension from the BIP
> author, who may then elect to force an immediate decision (risking a no),
> or choosing to allow more time.
Again, for the last time: Bitcoin Core maintainer does not decide about protocol or consensus level changes.
This is not a role for me. Find someone else, if you think you need an arbiter. There was an idea about a Bitcoin Standards Body once, but as far as I know that's not actively being worked on.
BTW: for more exposure a proposal is better posted as a new thread, not as a deep reply to an existing topic.
Wladimir
📝 Original message:On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 06:05:58PM +0200, Mike Hearn wrote:
> Once a draft BIP has been submitted to bitcoin-development for
> consideration, the Bitcoin Core maintainer will deliver a preliminary
> yes/no verdict within three weeks. This verdict may be informed by the
> debate that has taken part in the previous three weeks. If more time is
> required, the maintainer is required to request an extension from the BIP
> author, who may then elect to force an immediate decision (risking a no),
> or choosing to allow more time.
Again, for the last time: Bitcoin Core maintainer does not decide about protocol or consensus level changes.
This is not a role for me. Find someone else, if you think you need an arbiter. There was an idea about a Bitcoin Standards Body once, but as far as I know that's not actively being worked on.
BTW: for more exposure a proposal is better posted as a new thread, not as a deep reply to an existing topic.
Wladimir