The Dread Slender Gnome on Nostr: Thanks, I figured you'd know. I admit to being surprised to see "sex characteristics" ...
Thanks, I figured you'd know.
I admit to being surprised to see "sex characteristics" mentioned on the list at all. And I'm slightly surprised they went along with your proposal at all.
Does no-one ever point out the vagueness of the code when projects consider adopting it? It seems to me like a very obvious problem. Or do they take the vagueness as a good thing?
I admit to being surprised to see "sex characteristics" mentioned on the list at all. And I'm slightly surprised they went along with your proposal at all.
Does no-one ever point out the vagueness of the code when projects consider adopting it? It seems to me like a very obvious problem. Or do they take the vagueness as a good thing?