Event JSON
{
"id": "9191a6fbdcc46bbacdbb8b5fdab40fe2d4d476b3b173af16538b913c996f203d",
"pubkey": "493d7ba43e0d35db3f94d4df2460f216f4501045a859fc54a2032b288ff17e75",
"created_at": 1711096304,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"43d7c4ea3518ab0e604e97ac89e703d608b7e78536c31805e9b7347d83370577",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"b8de67a365b436ce300eb1049973026143f99e3d3712b326f302b7d6f49a2902",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"0d3fea3d4ffa7a7c0f5dc7448080be4015fc5380b18c8e90c65fcb7873445390",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://mastodon.social/users/KimSJ/statuses/112138407384556799",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1g0tuf634rz4suczwj7kgnecr6cyt0eu9xmp3sp0fku68mqehq4msp3tvm4 The chart in that paper suggests that positive real interest rates were the norm in the three decades before the 2008 banking crisis, and switched to negative thereafter. I guess my instincts are wrong. Perhaps that’s because consumer returns on savings tend to be below central bank nominal interest rates? I haven’t quite got my head round the IMF concept of the ‘natural’ value, either, which they seem to think should be slightly positive. 🤔",
"sig": "c1f1f408a608bf1318f663e705228373040ea8d8a90ca87223c53f18c658251f4668195210821ad3445239f7979eb5e4568ff95d2a8e9371a835c13e591822bc"
}