of nothing on Nostr: nprofile1q…ma880 nprofile1q…aytwj it has many negative hints about the speaker, ...
nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpq47ljzf0tf72v3lwsmkqt2tmzj77yg0akv2wrg7uwvfswww56wuysnma880 (nprofile…a880) nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqp8ez37jk5y3tk5t02wlapupdh9ja0q0zhdjxgr39e370rjnakres4aytwj (nprofile…ytwj) it has many negative hints about the speaker, but disregarding the speaker, it's fine. It's just
>women benefit LESS from men
>also men are so awful that men would vote for a regime that would make women benefit MORE from men
the fault is not in anything said, but in what's not said or even asked about: do women benefit from the status quo of women not benefiting as much from men? Would women not be happier under a regime where the labor supply halves but families continue to make the same amount of money and a woman can create a home with a family instead of doing boring makework or negative-value work in soul-crushing government and corporate offices?
>women benefit LESS from men
>also men are so awful that men would vote for a regime that would make women benefit MORE from men
the fault is not in anything said, but in what's not said or even asked about: do women benefit from the status quo of women not benefiting as much from men? Would women not be happier under a regime where the labor supply halves but families continue to make the same amount of money and a woman can create a home with a family instead of doing boring makework or negative-value work in soul-crushing government and corporate offices?