Mike Hearn [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: ๐ Original date posted:2014-04-08 ๐ Original message:> > Multi-sig requires ...
๐
Original date posted:2014-04-08
๐ Original message:>
> Multi-sig requires infrastructure. It isn't a magic wand that we can
> wave to make everyone secure. The protocols and techniques necessary
> don't exist yet, and apparently no one has much of an incentive to
> create them.
It is starting to happen. If you're OK with using a specific web wallet
there's BitGo and greenaddress.it already, though I think their risk
analysis is just sending you an SMS code. I wrote up an integration plan
for bitcoinj a few days ago:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/bitcoinj/Uxl-z40OLuQ
but guess what? It's quite complicated. As with all these features.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140408/650f36bd/attachment.html>
๐ Original message:>
> Multi-sig requires infrastructure. It isn't a magic wand that we can
> wave to make everyone secure. The protocols and techniques necessary
> don't exist yet, and apparently no one has much of an incentive to
> create them.
It is starting to happen. If you're OK with using a specific web wallet
there's BitGo and greenaddress.it already, though I think their risk
analysis is just sending you an SMS code. I wrote up an integration plan
for bitcoinj a few days ago:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/bitcoinj/Uxl-z40OLuQ
but guess what? It's quite complicated. As with all these features.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140408/650f36bd/attachment.html>