Xepher on Nostr: Woof, okay, let's take this point by point: >Also what "conspiracy" You just called ...
Woof, okay, let's take this point by point:
>Also what "conspiracy"
You just called the covid epidemic a psyop, so let's go with that one for now
>Silenced doctors - is that a conspiracy theory?
The ones in China? No, that's well known. If you're talking about anything else, then most likely, yes.
>mRNA vaccine injuries and deaths - is that a conspiracy theory?
There's always been a small percentage of people that are affected by vaccines. But that number is obscenely small compared to the number of people affected by letting the virus run its course. If anyone is trying to make more out of it then that, then yes, conspiracy.
>Calling two of the safest drugs know to man dangerous - is that a conspiracy theory?
I honestly don't even know what you're talking about here. Maybe this one is on me, but I don't keep up with all of the crazy.
>The six foot rule being arbitrary bullshit - is that a conspiracy theory?
Whether it was effective or not at the time, they were operating off the data they had. If it did nothing, then so what? Did it hurt people to stand 6ft apart for a few months?
>Cloth masks doing nothing to stop the spread of a respiratory virus - is that a conspiracy theory?
The statistics always said that mask mandates helped COVID spread to ~5% less people. Yeah, the percentage was small, but if everyone wearing a mask kept just 1 person alive that otherwise wouldn't have been, then great. If you don't think that's worth it, then fuck your feelings.
>Lockdowns doing nothing to stop the spread - is that a conspiracy theory?
Again, people were making calls off of the limited amount of data they had at the time. If the experts in infectious disease said locking down was a potential viable option, then you'd be stupid not to consider it.
>Vaccines not preventing infection or transmission - is that a conspiracy theory?
The fuck are you talking about? From the very beginning they said the vaccines would make the symptoms less severe if you contracted the virus, not prevent you from getting it. If that's what you thought, then you weren't listening.
>Vaccine passports and people being locked out of businesses and workplaces without one - is that a conspiracy theory?
Nope. And that was up to each business to enact their own rules as long as they compiled with laws for whatever state they were in. Not the best approach, but again things were being figured out as we went.
>Seriously what fuckin conspiracy are you talking about, or are you getting high on your own supply of 🐂💩? Seriously what fuckin conspiracy theory?
I'll refer you to my very first response to this post, thanks.
>Also what "conspiracy"
You just called the covid epidemic a psyop, so let's go with that one for now
>Silenced doctors - is that a conspiracy theory?
The ones in China? No, that's well known. If you're talking about anything else, then most likely, yes.
>mRNA vaccine injuries and deaths - is that a conspiracy theory?
There's always been a small percentage of people that are affected by vaccines. But that number is obscenely small compared to the number of people affected by letting the virus run its course. If anyone is trying to make more out of it then that, then yes, conspiracy.
>Calling two of the safest drugs know to man dangerous - is that a conspiracy theory?
I honestly don't even know what you're talking about here. Maybe this one is on me, but I don't keep up with all of the crazy.
>The six foot rule being arbitrary bullshit - is that a conspiracy theory?
Whether it was effective or not at the time, they were operating off the data they had. If it did nothing, then so what? Did it hurt people to stand 6ft apart for a few months?
>Cloth masks doing nothing to stop the spread of a respiratory virus - is that a conspiracy theory?
The statistics always said that mask mandates helped COVID spread to ~5% less people. Yeah, the percentage was small, but if everyone wearing a mask kept just 1 person alive that otherwise wouldn't have been, then great. If you don't think that's worth it, then fuck your feelings.
>Lockdowns doing nothing to stop the spread - is that a conspiracy theory?
Again, people were making calls off of the limited amount of data they had at the time. If the experts in infectious disease said locking down was a potential viable option, then you'd be stupid not to consider it.
>Vaccines not preventing infection or transmission - is that a conspiracy theory?
The fuck are you talking about? From the very beginning they said the vaccines would make the symptoms less severe if you contracted the virus, not prevent you from getting it. If that's what you thought, then you weren't listening.
>Vaccine passports and people being locked out of businesses and workplaces without one - is that a conspiracy theory?
Nope. And that was up to each business to enact their own rules as long as they compiled with laws for whatever state they were in. Not the best approach, but again things were being figured out as we went.
>Seriously what fuckin conspiracy are you talking about, or are you getting high on your own supply of 🐂💩? Seriously what fuckin conspiracy theory?
I'll refer you to my very first response to this post, thanks.