Clara Shikhelman [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2023-02-13 📝 Original message: Hi Vincent, Thanks to ...
📅 Original date posted:2023-02-13
📝 Original message:
Hi Vincent,
Thanks to write this down, do you think that it is a good idea
> to make a public google calendar (or other kind of shared calendar)?
>
Let's try this out:
https://calendar.google.com/calendar/u/2?cid=Mjc1ODRlNDNhMjE4NDQyYWMyN2JiZDY4NTlkNWQyZTU5ZWE3NGJiMWM2Mzk4Y2VmMzNhYTcwYWYzYjZjOTc2OEBncm91cC5jYWxlbmRhci5nb29nbGUuY29t
<https://calendar.google.com/calendar/u/2?cid=Mjc1ODRlNDNhMjE4NDQyYWMyN2JiZDY4NTlkNWQyZTU5ZWE3NGJiMWM2Mzk4Y2VmMzNhYTcwYWYzYjZjOTc2OEBncm91cC5jYWxlbmRhci5nb29nbGUuY29t>
There is also an ongoing attempt to define a kind of standard
> for the lightning network metrics started more thatn 1 year
> ago, and I also discussed in Oakland (but maybe some people
> was scared by the word `server`)
>
> The source code is available here https://github.com/LNOpenMetrics
> and for now the basic idea is to collect some data from different
> kind of node and analyze them before taking any decision to define
> any kind of protocol support via BOLT or BLIPS (I also I'm more inclined
> to a BLIPS because I think that different kind of node mobile vs LSP)
> can deserve different kind of metrics/reputation.
>
> There are some data already accessible via public API (for now)
> https://api.lnmetrics.info
> where it is possible to see some forwarding payment scoring by channels
> and node
> uptime.
>
>
This could be very useful, thanks for pointing it out!
Best,
Clara
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20230213/a11062ac/attachment.html>
📝 Original message:
Hi Vincent,
Thanks to write this down, do you think that it is a good idea
> to make a public google calendar (or other kind of shared calendar)?
>
Let's try this out:
https://calendar.google.com/calendar/u/2?cid=Mjc1ODRlNDNhMjE4NDQyYWMyN2JiZDY4NTlkNWQyZTU5ZWE3NGJiMWM2Mzk4Y2VmMzNhYTcwYWYzYjZjOTc2OEBncm91cC5jYWxlbmRhci5nb29nbGUuY29t
<https://calendar.google.com/calendar/u/2?cid=Mjc1ODRlNDNhMjE4NDQyYWMyN2JiZDY4NTlkNWQyZTU5ZWE3NGJiMWM2Mzk4Y2VmMzNhYTcwYWYzYjZjOTc2OEBncm91cC5jYWxlbmRhci5nb29nbGUuY29t>
There is also an ongoing attempt to define a kind of standard
> for the lightning network metrics started more thatn 1 year
> ago, and I also discussed in Oakland (but maybe some people
> was scared by the word `server`)
>
> The source code is available here https://github.com/LNOpenMetrics
> and for now the basic idea is to collect some data from different
> kind of node and analyze them before taking any decision to define
> any kind of protocol support via BOLT or BLIPS (I also I'm more inclined
> to a BLIPS because I think that different kind of node mobile vs LSP)
> can deserve different kind of metrics/reputation.
>
> There are some data already accessible via public API (for now)
> https://api.lnmetrics.info
> where it is possible to see some forwarding payment scoring by channels
> and node
> uptime.
>
>
This could be very useful, thanks for pointing it out!
Best,
Clara
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20230213/a11062ac/attachment.html>