π π π π π π π π on Nostr: ηΏ ζη³ > How is software that doesn't respect freedoms 1 and 3 not proprietary? ...
ηΏ ζη³ (npub1x2vβ¦ar98)
> How is software that doesn't respect freedoms 1 and 3 not proprietary?
Being proprietary requires having a copyright holder for it (proprietor), so I'd say it can't legally be considered proprietary. It's definitely not free software either, though.
> How is software that doesn't respect freedoms 1 and 3 not proprietary?
Being proprietary requires having a copyright holder for it (proprietor), so I'd say it can't legally be considered proprietary. It's definitely not free software either, though.