Clark Moody [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2018-10-18 📝 Original message:I agree with spelling out ...

📅 Original date posted:2018-10-18
📝 Original message:I agree with spelling out the `address` field.

As for "value is either an address or an array of addresses", there is no
standard for specifying an array in a URI, and processing different
querystring schemes is application-specific. (see
https://stackoverflow.com/a/9547490)

Since those app-specific methods don't necessarily preserve order, which is
important here, the most compatible fallback is a delimiter-separated list
under one parameter. Most languages have library functions for splitting
strings on commas.


-Clark


On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 5:13 PM vv01f via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> I already pointed out a while ago that the separator could be the & and
> the returning value is either an address or an array of addresses.
> So no comma or other delimiter needed.
> also I would suggest to call the parameter `address` and not a shortcut
> for it as we are used to `message` and `amount` spelled out as well.
>
> On 18.10.2018 16:20, Clark Moody via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > Since we don't know what sort of address changes will happen later on,
> you
> > could make this future-proof by passing a list of addresses to `addr`.
> >
> > The syntax is
> >
> > bitcoin:<address>[?addr=<address>[,<address>[,<address>]]]
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20181018/829726f5/attachment.html>;