📅 Original date posted:2015-06-18 📝 Original message:On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at ...

Gregory Maxwell [ARCHIVE] /

npub1f2n…rwet

2023-06-07 15:38:27

in reply to nevent1q…4gsj

📅 Original date posted:2015-06-18
📝 Original message:On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Mike Hearn <mike at plan99.net> wrote:
>> And allegations that the project is "run like wikipedia" or "an edit war"
>> are verifyably untrue.
>> Check the commit history.
>
> This was a reference to a post by Gregory on Reddit where he said if Gavin
> were to do a pull request for the block size change and then merge it, he
> would revert it. And I fully believe he would do so!

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/37pv74/gavin_andresen_moves_ahead_with_push_for_bigger/croxw9o?context=1

This is the only reddit comment I've made using the word revert in
recent memory, so I know you couldn't be referring to another.

>> I was recently in a situation similar to what Gavin is in insofar as a design dispute that could improperly solved by a git push. I'm pretty impressed he hasn't given in and done a midnight push. It's cool to see him back channeling support.
> Such a change would be immediately reverted.

And, I probably should have continued "and resulted with an immediate
revocation of commit rights on the assumption that his account had
been compromised."

There is nothing controversial about that.

Author Public Key

npub1f2nvlx49er5c7sqa43src6ssyp6snd4qwvtkwm5avc2l84cs84esecrwet

Show more details

Published at

2023-06-07 15:38:27

Kind type

1 Short Text Note

Event JSON

{ "id": "947e2f6b9f9f56b06507871a63b05a1fde365d825643968ae44d149668707e8e", "pubkey": "4aa6cf9aa5c8e98f401dac603c6a10207509b6a07317676e9d6615f3d7103d73", "created_at": 1686152307, "kind": 1, "tags": [ [ "e", "23c1bb2f25b9e7356b48aa2a86751c4f26fb3977b440917a1cb3512c200b0b2f", "", "root" ], [ "e", "e9a832fedde9ecbe7a85d77c8a84da92ba2d3f53313c9d36f46b830a7ed99857", "", "reply" ], [ "p", "f2c95df3766562e3b96b79a0254881c59e8639f23987846961cf55412a77f6f2" ] ], "content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-06-18\n📝 Original message:On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Mike Hearn \u003cmike at plan99.net\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\u003e And allegations that the project is \"run like wikipedia\" or \"an edit war\"\n\u003e\u003e are verifyably untrue.\n\u003e\u003e Check the commit history.\n\u003e\n\u003e This was a reference to a post by Gregory on Reddit where he said if Gavin\n\u003e were to do a pull request for the block size change and then merge it, he\n\u003e would revert it. And I fully believe he would do so!\n\nhttp://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/37pv74/gavin_andresen_moves_ahead_with_push_for_bigger/croxw9o?context=1\n\nThis is the only reddit comment I've made using the word revert in\nrecent memory, so I know you couldn't be referring to another.\n\n\u003e\u003e I was recently in a situation similar to what Gavin is in insofar as a design dispute that could improperly solved by a git push. I'm pretty impressed he hasn't given in and done a midnight push. It's cool to see him back channeling support.\n\u003e Such a change would be immediately reverted.\n\nAnd, I probably should have continued \"and resulted with an immediate\nrevocation of commit rights on the assumption that his account had\nbeen compromised.\"\n\nThere is nothing controversial about that.", "sig": "38bb8d7efa10cd395a75266826fc26a9fcfecbbfd948a6cb29019a408c08e1775b84d0f0580803800119c48849b609a6dd6a78d37460349d0a8b3fb6d486c3a0" }