Ghost Letters on Nostr: npub1sg4rc…7xslc > This kind of sexual harassment is explicitly cited as illegal by ...
npub1sg4rcvkxkp3sx7f0ex8rtdd9ylcdd2fchtfm22fy45h4w02p306qq7xslc (npub1sg4…xslc)
> This kind of sexual harassment is explicitly cited as illegal by Title VII of the US Civil Rights Act.
I cannot find this in the Act text (could be my fault as I do not fully understand this lengthy legal article). Secondary sources claim that without a "tangible employment consequence" there is no quid pro quo case. Or is this another case? Anyway, I would be interested in some (more specific) source if you have one at hand.
https://legal.thomsonreuters.com/en/insights/articles/what-is-quid-pro-quo-harassment
> This kind of sexual harassment is explicitly cited as illegal by Title VII of the US Civil Rights Act.
I cannot find this in the Act text (could be my fault as I do not fully understand this lengthy legal article). Secondary sources claim that without a "tangible employment consequence" there is no quid pro quo case. Or is this another case? Anyway, I would be interested in some (more specific) source if you have one at hand.
https://legal.thomsonreuters.com/en/insights/articles/what-is-quid-pro-quo-harassment