Felipe Micaroni Lalli [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2014-05-19 📝 Original message:Is the small number of ...
📅 Original date posted:2014-05-19
📝 Original message:Is the small number of bitcoin nodes a concern? If yes, why? What kind of attack can the network suffer? And where can we find statistical information about the full nodes running?
I guess the only effective incentive to keep a node running would be financial. A kind of proof of stake would be nice on bitcoin. But I have no idea how to begin with.
Felipe Micaroni Lalli
Walltime: https://walltime.info
Bitcoin Paranoid Android developer
PGP ID: 0x4c0afccfed5cde14
BTC: 1LipeR1AjHL6gwE7WQECW4a2H4tuqm768N
On 19/05/2014, at 07:39, Wladimir <laanwj at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Wladimir <laanwj at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Some hacking with ncurses could quickly make a decent tool here. It
>> could be packaged with bitcoin itself but that's not necessary. For
>> example Tor has the tool 'arm' which is a separate package.
>
> Regarding tor-arm, here are some screenshots:
> https://www.atagar.com/arm/screenshots.php
>
> It shows, among other things:
> - bandwidth up/down graphs
> - CPU usage
> - debug logging (in real time)
> - connected peers+statistics
> - currently active configuration
>
> Would be nice to have a similar tool for bitcoind.
>
> Wladimir
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
> Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.
> Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available
> Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140519/430cddf7/attachment.sig>;
📝 Original message:Is the small number of bitcoin nodes a concern? If yes, why? What kind of attack can the network suffer? And where can we find statistical information about the full nodes running?
I guess the only effective incentive to keep a node running would be financial. A kind of proof of stake would be nice on bitcoin. But I have no idea how to begin with.
Felipe Micaroni Lalli
Walltime: https://walltime.info
Bitcoin Paranoid Android developer
PGP ID: 0x4c0afccfed5cde14
BTC: 1LipeR1AjHL6gwE7WQECW4a2H4tuqm768N
On 19/05/2014, at 07:39, Wladimir <laanwj at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Wladimir <laanwj at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Some hacking with ncurses could quickly make a decent tool here. It
>> could be packaged with bitcoin itself but that's not necessary. For
>> example Tor has the tool 'arm' which is a separate package.
>
> Regarding tor-arm, here are some screenshots:
> https://www.atagar.com/arm/screenshots.php
>
> It shows, among other things:
> - bandwidth up/down graphs
> - CPU usage
> - debug logging (in real time)
> - connected peers+statistics
> - currently active configuration
>
> Would be nice to have a similar tool for bitcoind.
>
> Wladimir
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
> Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.
> Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available
> Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140519/430cddf7/attachment.sig>;