girino on Nostr: ## What’s Happening in Brazil Right Now? 🇧🇷 For my international friends who ...
## What’s Happening in Brazil Right Now? 🇧🇷
For my international friends who might not be following, here’s a quick summary of a recent controversy:
Earlier this year, the Brazilian government announced a new reporting requirement for banks, financial institutions, and credit card operators. The Federal Revenue Service would start requiring information on financial transactions made via PIX (an instant payment system launched in 2020) exceeding R$ 5,000 per individual, including both incoming and outgoing funds.
The opposition heavily criticized the measure, arguing that it would disproportionately harm informal and self-employed workers, such as bricklayers, painters, cleaners, and bakers. These professionals often receive payments directly through PIX and spend much of the money on supplies. To comply, they would need to keep detailed financial records and justify their transactions to the Federal Revenue Service, incurring additional costs and facing the risk of unfair taxation.
In response, government supporters accused the opposition of spreading fake news, claiming that PIX itself would be taxed, which was false. The actual criticism was about increased bureaucracy and financial surveillance, not a so-called "PIX tax."
Meanwhile, many informal workers and small business owners started reacting. As a form of protest, they began charging higher prices for PIX payments — typically around 15%, equivalent to the income tax rate for amounts above R$ 5,000.
Faced with the backlash, the government announced it would backtrack and issue a provisional measure banning the taxation of PIX (which was already a straw man created by government supporters to distract from the real issue). However, this provisional measure included a clause equating PIX payments with cash payments, effectively prohibiting businesses from charging different prices for transactions made via PIX or cash.
In other words, instead of stepping back, the government criminalized legitimate protests by merchants and workers, stripping them of their ability to resist the measure.
Much like the infamous "clothing tax" controversy, the government pretends to reverse its stance but is actually laying the groundwork for even greater financial surveillance. The protest has been silenced, but the underlying criticism remains.
#Brazil #BrazilNews #PIX #FinancialSurveillance #WorkersRights #InformalEconomy #SmallBusiness #Taxation #FinancialFreedom #GovernmentPolicies #ProtestPIX #Accountability
For my international friends who might not be following, here’s a quick summary of a recent controversy:
Earlier this year, the Brazilian government announced a new reporting requirement for banks, financial institutions, and credit card operators. The Federal Revenue Service would start requiring information on financial transactions made via PIX (an instant payment system launched in 2020) exceeding R$ 5,000 per individual, including both incoming and outgoing funds.
The opposition heavily criticized the measure, arguing that it would disproportionately harm informal and self-employed workers, such as bricklayers, painters, cleaners, and bakers. These professionals often receive payments directly through PIX and spend much of the money on supplies. To comply, they would need to keep detailed financial records and justify their transactions to the Federal Revenue Service, incurring additional costs and facing the risk of unfair taxation.
In response, government supporters accused the opposition of spreading fake news, claiming that PIX itself would be taxed, which was false. The actual criticism was about increased bureaucracy and financial surveillance, not a so-called "PIX tax."
Meanwhile, many informal workers and small business owners started reacting. As a form of protest, they began charging higher prices for PIX payments — typically around 15%, equivalent to the income tax rate for amounts above R$ 5,000.
Faced with the backlash, the government announced it would backtrack and issue a provisional measure banning the taxation of PIX (which was already a straw man created by government supporters to distract from the real issue). However, this provisional measure included a clause equating PIX payments with cash payments, effectively prohibiting businesses from charging different prices for transactions made via PIX or cash.
In other words, instead of stepping back, the government criminalized legitimate protests by merchants and workers, stripping them of their ability to resist the measure.
Much like the infamous "clothing tax" controversy, the government pretends to reverse its stance but is actually laying the groundwork for even greater financial surveillance. The protest has been silenced, but the underlying criticism remains.
#Brazil #BrazilNews #PIX #FinancialSurveillance #WorkersRights #InformalEconomy #SmallBusiness #Taxation #FinancialFreedom #GovernmentPolicies #ProtestPIX #Accountability