Rusty Russell [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-12-13 📝 Original message:Jannes Faber via ...

📅 Original date posted:2015-12-13
📝 Original message:Jannes Faber via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> writes:
> Segregated IBLT
>
> I was just wondering if it would make sense when we have SW to also make
> Segregated IBLT? Segregating transactions from signatures and then tune the
> parameters such that transactions have a slightly higher guarantee and save
> a bit of space on the signatures side.

It just falls out naturally. If the peer doesn't want the witnesses,
they don't get serialized into the IBLT.

Cheers,
Rusty.