LuisSP on Nostr: Experiente litigadora contra Big Pharma acha que processo contra Pfizer por ...
Experiente litigadora contra Big Pharma acha que processo contra Pfizer por propaganda enganosa é só teatro eleitoreiro 'cumsevadô didireitcha' dos gringos.
explica porque legalmente a Pfizer não precisa cumprir consumer protection laws, e deve ganhar o caso. O PREP Act e EULA dão carta branca à Pfizer.
https://substack.com/@bailiwicknews/note/c-59497624
Replicando aqui: Katherine Watt
In my view, it’s another nothingburger/distraction from public health emergency kill box laws and contracts (federal, state, local, international) and the criminal cabal comprised of DoD, HHS, FDA and pharma manufacturers, jointly engaged (with many other government agencies, and NGOs) in intentional worldwide poisoning campaigns.
Like Texas/AG Paxton v. Pfizer, the Kansas case is being brought under state consumer product/consumer protection laws.
Covid vaccines are not consumer products.
They’re not subject to consumer protection or deceptive marketing laws.
Pfizer is not a private company.
In the PREP/EUA/DPA context, under PREP Act and Defense Production Act, Pfizer is a branch of the US government, and therefore immune from suit.
Pfizer never had any legal obligation to conduct valid clinical trials or report valid, truthful safety and efficacy data to FDA or to the public.
FDA is not a regulatory agency.
FDA is a regulatory-simulation agency, with a mission to deceive the public into believing the lies that regulation of unregulated and unregulatable, undefined and undefinable biological products has occurred in the past, is occurring in the present and will occur in the future.
FDA has never had any legal obligation to supervise valid clinical trials for biological products, vaccines or EUA products, ensure the validity of safety and efficacy claims, or apply or enforce cGMP manufacturing rules to ensure safety, efficacy and purity of products to be distributed and used.
explica porque legalmente a Pfizer não precisa cumprir consumer protection laws, e deve ganhar o caso. O PREP Act e EULA dão carta branca à Pfizer.
https://substack.com/@bailiwicknews/note/c-59497624
Replicando aqui: Katherine Watt
In my view, it’s another nothingburger/distraction from public health emergency kill box laws and contracts (federal, state, local, international) and the criminal cabal comprised of DoD, HHS, FDA and pharma manufacturers, jointly engaged (with many other government agencies, and NGOs) in intentional worldwide poisoning campaigns.
Like Texas/AG Paxton v. Pfizer, the Kansas case is being brought under state consumer product/consumer protection laws.
Covid vaccines are not consumer products.
They’re not subject to consumer protection or deceptive marketing laws.
Pfizer is not a private company.
In the PREP/EUA/DPA context, under PREP Act and Defense Production Act, Pfizer is a branch of the US government, and therefore immune from suit.
Pfizer never had any legal obligation to conduct valid clinical trials or report valid, truthful safety and efficacy data to FDA or to the public.
FDA is not a regulatory agency.
FDA is a regulatory-simulation agency, with a mission to deceive the public into believing the lies that regulation of unregulated and unregulatable, undefined and undefinable biological products has occurred in the past, is occurring in the present and will occur in the future.
FDA has never had any legal obligation to supervise valid clinical trials for biological products, vaccines or EUA products, ensure the validity of safety and efficacy claims, or apply or enforce cGMP manufacturing rules to ensure safety, efficacy and purity of products to be distributed and used.