lucash.dev on Nostr: My “über normie” friend was “explaining” to me the other day how AI can’t ...
My “über normie” friend was “explaining” to me the other day how AI can’t be manipulated and asking ChatGPT about something is more reliable than googling it — bc top search results might be “fake news” while the AI generated answer will be based on the entire web.
He then justified his claims by pointing out he studied machine learning in college and oversaw machine learning projects as an exec.
A little education can a be a lot more dangerous than no education at all.
I expect this to be the narrative moving forward — AI is scientifically guaranteed to be correct.
Not trusting whatever (regulated) AI says will be called “AI denialism” and considered more dangerous than terrorism.
“Regulating AI” is an attempt at creating a fake god that can’t be questioned— and removing the need for messy non-compliant human thought and communication from the equation.
You think the “I believe in Science” crowd was bad, wait for the “I believe in AI” crowd.
If they get their way it will be a nightmare.
He then justified his claims by pointing out he studied machine learning in college and oversaw machine learning projects as an exec.
A little education can a be a lot more dangerous than no education at all.
I expect this to be the narrative moving forward — AI is scientifically guaranteed to be correct.
Not trusting whatever (regulated) AI says will be called “AI denialism” and considered more dangerous than terrorism.
“Regulating AI” is an attempt at creating a fake god that can’t be questioned— and removing the need for messy non-compliant human thought and communication from the equation.
You think the “I believe in Science” crowd was bad, wait for the “I believe in AI” crowd.
If they get their way it will be a nightmare.