🎓 Dr. Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 on Nostr: #[0] so in terms of receipts you have two categories here... One is not receipts at ...
npub1ttkqmpglj0t5h5r3t4xj5sdl7vezj03k7rp42h4jqkxlwsrgc0qqxfx6r5 (npub1ttk…x6r5) so in terms of receipts you have two categories here...
One is not receipts at all, like the attached screenshot, it is literally someone making accusations and a screenshot of that. That is not a receipt.
The joepie "receipt" is closer to being a receipt, its a screenshot of something i said at least. But it was also exposed as being a lie as it intentionally left out content to manipulate my response, which i replied to that link with thr full receipt. Lets break down that receipt shall we:
I woukd ask if i woukd defederate with child porn. I said no one had ever reported child porn so it wasnt an issue that had came up before... i immediately brought it up to the moderators at qoto and within 30 minutes got a preemptive rulling ton child porn and within moments of being asked the question we made a rulling and updated our ToS to address child porn and prohibit it. So within minutes in that same conversation i updated them as to our policy... that was of course left out of the screenshots andni have provided them.
Now ask yourself why did a server provide receipts that intentionally left out such an important response in the thread, a response that completely changes the receipt.
Do you really think receipts so blatantly manipulated and dishonest without showing important details and rejecting them when presented has any place on a publictly curated and adopted list? Does that really even count as a receipt when its so blatantly manipulated out of context?
One is not receipts at all, like the attached screenshot, it is literally someone making accusations and a screenshot of that. That is not a receipt.
The joepie "receipt" is closer to being a receipt, its a screenshot of something i said at least. But it was also exposed as being a lie as it intentionally left out content to manipulate my response, which i replied to that link with thr full receipt. Lets break down that receipt shall we:
I woukd ask if i woukd defederate with child porn. I said no one had ever reported child porn so it wasnt an issue that had came up before... i immediately brought it up to the moderators at qoto and within 30 minutes got a preemptive rulling ton child porn and within moments of being asked the question we made a rulling and updated our ToS to address child porn and prohibit it. So within minutes in that same conversation i updated them as to our policy... that was of course left out of the screenshots andni have provided them.
Now ask yourself why did a server provide receipts that intentionally left out such an important response in the thread, a response that completely changes the receipt.
Do you really think receipts so blatantly manipulated and dishonest without showing important details and rejecting them when presented has any place on a publictly curated and adopted list? Does that really even count as a receipt when its so blatantly manipulated out of context?