Anarthlic on Nostr: The dynastic system of governance under a monarch who owns his property and kingdom, ...
The dynastic system of governance under a monarch who owns his property and kingdom, works best. This was the traditional practice that achieved civilization.
Political dynasties in democratic systems are composed of caretakers (not rulers and landlords) because they don’t own the property and kingdom they govern. This was the more novel practice invented by stupid social contract theorists. Yes, the hacienda system (while not perfect), in principle, works very well—but ONLY if the ruler is an owner and not a mere caretaker—the crucial caveat.
Reality check: Naive children of “light” have put in power and authority, those children of the world who are really but caretakers. And that stupid social contract theory (that never existed) cemented it all.
Political dynasties in democratic systems are composed of caretakers (not rulers and landlords) because they don’t own the property and kingdom they govern. This was the more novel practice invented by stupid social contract theorists. Yes, the hacienda system (while not perfect), in principle, works very well—but ONLY if the ruler is an owner and not a mere caretaker—the crucial caveat.
Reality check: Naive children of “light” have put in power and authority, those children of the world who are really but caretakers. And that stupid social contract theory (that never existed) cemented it all.