Stepan Snigirev [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2019-08-01 📝 Original message:> why not use Bitcoin ...
📅 Original date posted:2019-08-01
📝 Original message:> why not use Bitcoin compact uint, which most PSBT consumers already
implement?
I totally agree with that, compact int parsing is already implemented in
all bitcoin applications, wallets and libraries. Also, for certain (mb
proprietary) applications I will be willing to use multi-byte keys where
the first byte defines the application type and next bytes define
application-specific fields.
I would suggest to set proprietary bytes to 0xF0-0xFC or to 0xE0-0xEF then
(E for Enterprise?).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20190801/ce1e063c/attachment.html>
📝 Original message:> why not use Bitcoin compact uint, which most PSBT consumers already
implement?
I totally agree with that, compact int parsing is already implemented in
all bitcoin applications, wallets and libraries. Also, for certain (mb
proprietary) applications I will be willing to use multi-byte keys where
the first byte defines the application type and next bytes define
application-specific fields.
I would suggest to set proprietary bytes to 0xF0-0xFC or to 0xE0-0xEF then
(E for Enterprise?).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20190801/ce1e063c/attachment.html>