crypto on Nostr: If by study you mean read approved books or go to school, no. If you mean understand ...
If by study you mean read approved books or go to school, no. If you mean understand religion, philosophy and psychology through childhood, experience and story and philosophical teachings and reading and watching videos online then sure. I'm getting the impression here that if I haven't read what you've read you are very exclusive of what you are willing to listen to. I notice how you talk in name drop and I talk in ideas. You even talk in named ideas and strawman them. "zero sum" is one example. If it isn't named or doesn't have an author you approve of them you aren't very receptive and that's very limiting imo. I think I've said enough to get my point across regardless of whether I met your approved reading quota. This is all based on an argument from authority which is a logical fallacy. It's doesn't automatically make you wrong or something but it's not great for communicating ideas. You seem to be more receptive to poetry but I find that to be manipulative so I don't do it.
Published at
2024-12-29 12:29:13Event JSON
{
"id": "9e81ad89ad2635aaebee1d401cb7a2afe956b916dc1f854830cfdcb327b5d202",
"pubkey": "e70d71824084899c4d05112acb6fa8b76f3206ff38bafac2c0c9c431e6e389b9",
"created_at": 1735475353,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"d42fcb1d627cb5febd1c233ac805091f330c71b4f114e164fb0efabf140b137f",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"cf1869b994fc49aeec63dbddd9421b94bad650b5aa3026ac28c761065a3abe65"
],
[
"e",
"8b0c277c5a56f50647e12f78c50d70b1d7c065c9bb0c9af1dd60838773115e4c",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"5b29255d5eaaaeb577552bf0d11030376f477d19a009c5f5a80ddc73d49359f6"
],
[
"p",
"e70d71824084899c4d05112acb6fa8b76f3206ff38bafac2c0c9c431e6e389b9"
]
],
"content": "If by study you mean read approved books or go to school, no. If you mean understand religion, philosophy and psychology through childhood, experience and story and philosophical teachings and reading and watching videos online then sure. I'm getting the impression here that if I haven't read what you've read you are very exclusive of what you are willing to listen to. I notice how you talk in name drop and I talk in ideas. You even talk in named ideas and strawman them. \"zero sum\" is one example. If it isn't named or doesn't have an author you approve of them you aren't very receptive and that's very limiting imo. I think I've said enough to get my point across regardless of whether I met your approved reading quota. This is all based on an argument from authority which is a logical fallacy. It's doesn't automatically make you wrong or something but it's not great for communicating ideas. You seem to be more receptive to poetry but I find that to be manipulative so I don't do it.",
"sig": "da135fb1e9afb7cee2d0ef42400cbf42b760802d4211ab6181da28e48e4bc764b7f2aaf462bf7c21b1c717919672140df3deff4c066737a3a4c5e975c7d41153"
}