Abdel on Nostr: Thank you sir! > DVMs and zero-knowledge computation seems like a match made in ...
Thank you sir!
> DVMs and zero-knowledge computation seems like a match made in heaven.
100% man! The more I think about it the more obvious to me.
> I'm personally not a big fan of ZK as a scaling solution for Bitcoin.
Could you give a TL;DR on why ? I haven't seen you expand on the reasons why. You can point me to existing content where you expressed your sentiment on this topic if you prefer.
Let say it's possible to completely remove trust assumptions and have decentralised sequencers and provers, fully permissionless, with escape hatches etc. Even in this scenario you would not be fan ?
What are your concerns ? Security ? Garbage usage of Bitcoin ?
> DVMs and zero-knowledge computation seems like a match made in heaven.
100% man! The more I think about it the more obvious to me.
> I'm personally not a big fan of ZK as a scaling solution for Bitcoin.
Could you give a TL;DR on why ? I haven't seen you expand on the reasons why. You can point me to existing content where you expressed your sentiment on this topic if you prefer.
Let say it's possible to completely remove trust assumptions and have decentralised sequencers and provers, fully permissionless, with escape hatches etc. Even in this scenario you would not be fan ?
What are your concerns ? Security ? Garbage usage of Bitcoin ?