jl2012 [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-12-21 📝 Original message:I proposed something very ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-12-21
📝 Original message:I proposed something very similar 2 years ago:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=283746.0
This is an interesting academic idea. But the way you implement it will
immediately kill all existing full and SPV nodes (not really dead,
rather like zombie as they can't send and receive any tx).
joe2015--- via bitcoin-dev 於 2015-12-20 05:56 寫到:
> This is a draft.
>
> --joe
>
> Introduction
> ============
>
> It is generally assumed that increasing the blocksize limit requires a
> hardfork. Instead we show that a increasing the limit can be achieved
> using a
> "generalized" softfork. Like standard softforks, generalized softforks
> need a
> mere miner majority (>50% hashpower) rather than global consensus.
>
📝 Original message:I proposed something very similar 2 years ago:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=283746.0
This is an interesting academic idea. But the way you implement it will
immediately kill all existing full and SPV nodes (not really dead,
rather like zombie as they can't send and receive any tx).
joe2015--- via bitcoin-dev 於 2015-12-20 05:56 寫到:
> This is a draft.
>
> --joe
>
> Introduction
> ============
>
> It is generally assumed that increasing the blocksize limit requires a
> hardfork. Instead we show that a increasing the limit can be achieved
> using a
> "generalized" softfork. Like standard softforks, generalized softforks
> need a
> mere miner majority (>50% hashpower) rather than global consensus.
>