Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2014-01-13 📝 Original message:On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at ...

📅 Original date posted:2014-01-13
📝 Original message:On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:10:56PM -0800, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> Uh while I'm responding again, what I'd discussed with Peter Todd in
> IRC used two EC points in the stealth address. One for the payment and
> one for the ECDH. The reason to use two is that it makes delegating
> detection possible and so you don't have to have you spending keys
> online to even detect these payments. Why'd that get dropped?

I mentioned it again in another email; I just forgot to include it in my
final write-up.

--
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
00000000000000023d5a8bbe131414328a6c50a2741933ba03775afd3c3db395
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140113/276bfc39/attachment.sig>;