ZmnSCPxj [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2023-09-19 🗒️ Summary of this message: Erik asked ...
📅 Original date posted:2023-09-19
🗒️ Summary of this message: Erik asked about replacing CTV usage with Musig2 and if it changes the trust model. ZmnSCPxj explains that Musig2 is an n-of-n signing algorithm, meaning all entities are part of the set, maintaining trust minimization.
📝 Original message:
Good morning Erik,
> > replacing CTV usage with Musig2
>
>
> this changes the trust model to a federated one vs trustless and also increases the on-chain footprint of failure, correct?
As I understand it, no.
MuSig and MuSig2 are n-of-n signing algorithms.
The implied usage is that all entities `A_i` for all `i` and `B` dedicated LN node are in the n-of-n set.
The argument that 2-of-2 channels are non-custodial and trust-minimized extends to n-of-n for all n.
Regards,
ZmnSCPxj
🗒️ Summary of this message: Erik asked about replacing CTV usage with Musig2 and if it changes the trust model. ZmnSCPxj explains that Musig2 is an n-of-n signing algorithm, meaning all entities are part of the set, maintaining trust minimization.
📝 Original message:
Good morning Erik,
> > replacing CTV usage with Musig2
>
>
> this changes the trust model to a federated one vs trustless and also increases the on-chain footprint of failure, correct?
As I understand it, no.
MuSig and MuSig2 are n-of-n signing algorithms.
The implied usage is that all entities `A_i` for all `i` and `B` dedicated LN node are in the n-of-n set.
The argument that 2-of-2 channels are non-custodial and trust-minimized extends to n-of-n for all n.
Regards,
ZmnSCPxj