Sriram Karra [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: š Original date posted:2015-08-11 š Original message:On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at ...
š
Original date posted:2015-08-11
š Original message:On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Mike Hearn via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Hey Jonas,
>
> I think your analysis of what (some) users need is a good one.
>
> We've discussed this before so I know you prefer your current approach,
> but I personally would take a slightly different path to reach the same end:
>
> 1. Support serving of SPV wallets from pruned storage. This means some
> protocol upgrades, BIPs, etc. It helps all SPV wallets, including on phones.
> 2. Then make a bitcoinj based desktop wallet app, that contains a
> bundled bitcoind.
>
> It makes a lot of sense to have single set of reference implementations
for the different components. So unless you also support something you have
not explicitly stated - get rid of bitcoin-qt in its current form, the
above does not meet the spirit of Jonas' original post - which makes a load
of sense to me.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150811/895b5247/attachment.html>
š Original message:On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Mike Hearn via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Hey Jonas,
>
> I think your analysis of what (some) users need is a good one.
>
> We've discussed this before so I know you prefer your current approach,
> but I personally would take a slightly different path to reach the same end:
>
> 1. Support serving of SPV wallets from pruned storage. This means some
> protocol upgrades, BIPs, etc. It helps all SPV wallets, including on phones.
> 2. Then make a bitcoinj based desktop wallet app, that contains a
> bundled bitcoind.
>
> It makes a lot of sense to have single set of reference implementations
for the different components. So unless you also support something you have
not explicitly stated - get rid of bitcoin-qt in its current form, the
above does not meet the spirit of Jonas' original post - which makes a load
of sense to me.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150811/895b5247/attachment.html>