📅 Original date posted:2014-04-21 📝 Original message:Not a bad idea. Semantics ...

Rodney Morris [ARCHIVE] /

npub1y2w…9apx

2023-06-07 15:19:16

in reply to nevent1q…m6ke

📅 Original date posted:2014-04-21
📝 Original message:Not a bad idea. Semantics of the word abuse not withstanding.

I don't want to become the self appointed mailing list cop, but I notice it
maybe more than others because I almost exclusively read this mailing list
on a mobile device. Hence my asking for feedback without publicly calling
anyone out.

Thanks for taking the time to reply.

Rodney
On 21/04/2014 3:47 pm, "Wladimir" <laanwj at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 6:58 AM, Rodney Morris <rodney.morris at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > What is the procedure for dealing with it? Is it considered abuse to
> reply
> > to and quote the entire digest for the sake of a few lines of content?
> Am I
> > the only one annoyed by this (if so I'll just shut right up).
>
> I would not go as far as calling it 'abuse' if it is not done on
> purpose. Probably the person doesn't even know he/she is doing this.
> Best to mail the person and ask (nicely) instead of complaining to the
> list.
>
> Wladimir
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140421/9cd49c00/attachment.html>;

Author Public Key

npub1y2wcan7yptzyrg55znun2r66q8dgery6vehmyhnq0fhx09d2pndskl9apx

Show more details

Published at

2023-06-07 15:19:16

Kind type

1 Short Text Note

Event JSON

{ "id": "9f28f3b723a992a7beeb07fec32632dbce86751e218ac756097e8a8090812d80", "pubkey": "229d8ecfc40ac441a29414f9350f5a01da8c8c9a666fb25e607a6e6795aa0cdb", "created_at": 1686151156, "kind": 1, "tags": [ [ "e", "7a1ada427c9be544b6e88e80dc601b3e20d46ae9be5c7d57aa3e154d65d3b63f", "", "root" ], [ "e", "d9c8f0b15a87ff63620b16404270718e94150f30f4f9db3961b713b7e67332f5", "", "reply" ], [ "p", "30217b018a47b99ed4c20399b44b02f70ec4f58ed77a2814a563fa28322ef722" ] ], "content": "📅 Original date posted:2014-04-21\n📝 Original message:Not a bad idea. Semantics of the word abuse not withstanding.\n\nI don't want to become the self appointed mailing list cop, but I notice it\nmaybe more than others because I almost exclusively read this mailing list\non a mobile device. Hence my asking for feedback without publicly calling\nanyone out.\n\nThanks for taking the time to reply.\n\nRodney\n On 21/04/2014 3:47 pm, \"Wladimir\" \u003claanwj at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 6:58 AM, Rodney Morris \u003crodney.morris at gmail.com\u003e\n\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \u003e What is the procedure for dealing with it? Is it considered abuse to\n\u003e reply\n\u003e \u003e to and quote the entire digest for the sake of a few lines of content?\n\u003e Am I\n\u003e \u003e the only one annoyed by this (if so I'll just shut right up).\n\u003e\n\u003e I would not go as far as calling it 'abuse' if it is not done on\n\u003e purpose. Probably the person doesn't even know he/she is doing this.\n\u003e Best to mail the person and ask (nicely) instead of complaining to the\n\u003e list.\n\u003e\n\u003e Wladimir\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140421/9cd49c00/attachment.html\u003e", "sig": "e91a5d3c12fd74cae77633340378298ca5f2bffbf1c4a1f55e771ce1b844198052b9a425431b3c00994b9418671385acc35df4c222922862341a8895ccf6fa14" }