Luke-Jr [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2012-01-27 📝 Original message:On Friday, January 27, ...
📅 Original date posted:2012-01-27
📝 Original message:On Friday, January 27, 2012 5:51:04 PM Amir Taaki wrote:
> BIP 0020 is the old URI scheme BIPisized.
>
> ATM it is Draft status.
It's been Final (even according to BIP 1 standards) since late January 2011.
The only change recently is assigning it a BIP number for formality.
> I do not know enough about the discussion back last year to know whether to
> move it to Accepted status or not. My feelings are that having a
> re-decision (even if it was accepted last year) is healthy since it makes
> no sense to have a standard before a standardisation process existed.
Once P2SH is deployed, it will probably make good sense to revisit the URI
Scheme for revision, and eventually move BIP 20 to Replaced/Superceded status.
📝 Original message:On Friday, January 27, 2012 5:51:04 PM Amir Taaki wrote:
> BIP 0020 is the old URI scheme BIPisized.
>
> ATM it is Draft status.
It's been Final (even according to BIP 1 standards) since late January 2011.
The only change recently is assigning it a BIP number for formality.
> I do not know enough about the discussion back last year to know whether to
> move it to Accepted status or not. My feelings are that having a
> re-decision (even if it was accepted last year) is healthy since it makes
> no sense to have a standard before a standardisation process existed.
Once P2SH is deployed, it will probably make good sense to revisit the URI
Scheme for revision, and eventually move BIP 20 to Replaced/Superceded status.