Emeritus Prof Christopher May on Nostr: The conclusion by Michael Gove's 'independent' review of the Teeside regeneration ...
The conclusion by Michael Gove's 'independent' review of the Teeside regeneration project that there was 'no evidence of corruption or illegality' seems to have cut little ice with MPs who are now trying to get the National Audit Office to investigate (although it would need Gove's -unlikely - instruction to do so).
There's definitely a smell of corruption coming from the project but how that's formally 'uncovered' may need to wait for a new Govt & even then may not be confirmed.
#corruption
Published at
2024-04-26 07:08:28Event JSON
{
"id": "9d29e184b362f89f70f5ef3a3d8d3ddd0220123980dd78a751113341dca28eaf",
"pubkey": "b8de67a365b436ce300eb1049973026143f99e3d3712b326f302b7d6f49a2902",
"created_at": 1714115308,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"Corruption"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://zirk.us/users/ChrisMayLA6/statuses/112336260830103709",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "The conclusion by Michael Gove's 'independent' review of the Teeside regeneration project that there was 'no evidence of corruption or illegality' seems to have cut little ice with MPs who are now trying to get the National Audit Office to investigate (although it would need Gove's -unlikely - instruction to do so).\n\nThere's definitely a smell of corruption coming from the project but how that's formally 'uncovered' may need to wait for a new Govt \u0026 even then may not be confirmed.\n\n#corruption",
"sig": "7fe2dae697b35fea9f8902ab050ca25999d200d57b829dea11653cfb57f23d187f206e6801eafd538e0f436e6331c9e8a0b737dd8aa6048aca8ccf1332133e67"
}
