kravietz 🦇 on Nostr: npub1cscw5…t8pjk > legislating MAXIMUM security standards by making the current ...
npub1cscw5kknl3mwpqs8g8udnnwklzwpa2klfzl4wpumuwyjypppg5aset8pjk (npub1csc…8pjk)
> legislating MAXIMUM security standards by making the current level the mandatory set and barring anything else
Okay, let's make a step back, because both you and me seem to be taking what the "stop eIDAS" website says for granted. Can you point me to the exact wording of eIDAS that confirms your criticism?
They talk about the "language of art 45" all the time but they don't even link to the regulation. Do you think this is the best standard of a public debate?
> legislating MAXIMUM security standards by making the current level the mandatory set and barring anything else
Okay, let's make a step back, because both you and me seem to be taking what the "stop eIDAS" website says for granted. Can you point me to the exact wording of eIDAS that confirms your criticism?
They talk about the "language of art 45" all the time but they don't even link to the regulation. Do you think this is the best standard of a public debate?