📅 Original date posted:2015-08-29 📝 Original message:On Aug 29, 2015 7:02 PM, ...

Jorge Timón [ARCHIVE] /

npub1fx9…l2d8

2023-06-07 17:38:28

in reply to nevent1q…p6y0

📅 Original date posted:2015-08-29
📝 Original message:On Aug 29, 2015 7:02 PM, "Chun Wang via bitcoin-dev" <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 4:10 AM, Jorge Timón
> <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
/tx/3b95a766d7a99b87188d6875c8484cb2b310b78459b7816d4dfc3f0f7e04281a?chain=000000000933ea01ad0ee984209779baaec3ced90fa3f408719526f8d77f4943
> >
> > (a tx in testnet)
> >
> >
/block/00000000000000000b0d504d142ac8bdd1a2721d19f423a8146d0d6de882167b?chain=000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f
>
> Some altcoins (LTC and FTC for example) have the same genesis block hash.

That's obviously a design mistake in FTC, but it's not unsolvable. FTC
could move their genesis block to the next block (or the first one that is
not identical to LTC's).

Bitcoin and all its test chains have different genesis blocks, so I'm not
sure FTC should be a concern for a BIP anyway...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150830/bbc89393/attachment.html>;

Author Public Key

npub1fx98zxt3lzspjs5f4msr0fxysx5euucm29ghysryju7vpc9j0jzqtcl2d8

Show more details

Published at

2023-06-07 17:38:28

Kind type

1 Short Text Note

Event JSON

{ "id": "9a8f71c7ee4d1a36c8b7f94747ee933e30b16f2e75c92cb06630fa9b169c79b1", "pubkey": "498a711971f8a0194289aee037a4c481a99e731b5151724064973cc0e0b27c84", "created_at": 1686159508, "kind": 1, "tags": [ [ "e", "7cc8d14173d1f56e3744d772d4d70152d07a99a0b5f93142926f4b2f8204351e", "", "root" ], [ "e", "b5726bf35dca705a263bced1ae51b1b90595b2d26a421a62bc05d27e66954f4b", "", "reply" ], [ "p", "cb447013f90240d6e2c4941f91d80483153f692eeadd154f370ee96f23235a6b" ] ], "content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-08-29\n📝 Original message:On Aug 29, 2015 7:02 PM, \"Chun Wang via bitcoin-dev\" \u003c\nbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\n\u003e On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 4:10 AM, Jorge Timón\n\u003e \u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\n/tx/3b95a766d7a99b87188d6875c8484cb2b310b78459b7816d4dfc3f0f7e04281a?chain=000000000933ea01ad0ee984209779baaec3ced90fa3f408719526f8d77f4943\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e (a tx in testnet)\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e\n/block/00000000000000000b0d504d142ac8bdd1a2721d19f423a8146d0d6de882167b?chain=000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f\n\u003e\n\u003e Some altcoins (LTC and FTC for example) have the same genesis block hash.\n\nThat's obviously a design mistake in FTC, but it's not unsolvable. FTC\ncould move their genesis block to the next block (or the first one that is\nnot identical to LTC's).\n\nBitcoin and all its test chains have different genesis blocks, so I'm not\nsure FTC should be a concern for a BIP anyway...\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150830/bbc89393/attachment.html\u003e", "sig": "76e2036b3110caa4e7ca64bee4e1339e8a6c4de651137c490b6caf486a12034b6d3bc88cdbe6cfd3066198a5d513e740b83be44a4a8fc5918d63712f6c317036" }