Jean-Pierre Rupp [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: π Original date posted:2014-11-20 π Original message:Agree, There are many ...
π
Original date posted:2014-11-20
π Original message:Agree,
There are many legitimate uses for a larger OP_RETURN, and application developers are already complaining that the current size is not enough. It is about adding value to the blockchain. I know it can grow the blockchain faster, but so far at 40 bytes Bitcoin hasn't experienced death by bloat, nor that is even close to happen. I understand starting with a prudent approach, but I think it is safe to increase this without worrying. Actually I would make it even bigger than 80 bytes.
Cheers
On 17/11/14 02:30, Wladimir wrote:
> Agreed. I'm in favor of increasing OP_RETURN size as well. Don't care
> about the actual size.
--
Be Happy :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0x310A8A5B.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 4574 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20141120/8e335a7f/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: root.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20141120/8e335a7f/attachment.vcf>
π Original message:Agree,
There are many legitimate uses for a larger OP_RETURN, and application developers are already complaining that the current size is not enough. It is about adding value to the blockchain. I know it can grow the blockchain faster, but so far at 40 bytes Bitcoin hasn't experienced death by bloat, nor that is even close to happen. I understand starting with a prudent approach, but I think it is safe to increase this without worrying. Actually I would make it even bigger than 80 bytes.
Cheers
On 17/11/14 02:30, Wladimir wrote:
> Agreed. I'm in favor of increasing OP_RETURN size as well. Don't care
> about the actual size.
--
Be Happy :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0x310A8A5B.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 4574 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20141120/8e335a7f/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: root.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20141120/8e335a7f/attachment.vcf>